Wednesday, March 25, 2009
What i learned
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Historic
Steroids were first developed in the 1930's. The Germans first used dogs as a test subject, and then they use their own soldiers in the Second World War. Then in the 1950's many Russian and European athletes began to find that steroids were very beneficial to their goals and soon after began dominating the sport of power lifting, crushing previous world records. It seems that the use of anabolic steroids by athletes is relatively new. Testosterone was first synthesized in the 1930's and was introduced into the sporting arena in the 1940's and 1950's. In the 195’2 Olympics there was a team of weight lifters that had won a lot of medals more than average. Some American physicians became curious that U. S. competitors should have the same advantage of having a lot of medals in one Olympic. In 1958 a U.S. pharmaceutical firm had developed anabolic steroids. While the Physician was so busy doping up U.S. athletes they soon realized the drugs had side effects, but it was too late to keep the sports world from using the drug. When it first started it was mainly use by people who were throwers or competitors who relied heavily on bulk and strength. During the 1970's the request grew, as athletes in other sports brought the competitive edge that anabolic steroids seemed to provide. By the 1980's, as non athletes also discovered the body-enhancing properties of steroids, a black market began to flourish for the illegal production and sale of the drugs for nonmedical purposes. The Olympics started testing for certain kinds of drugs, like amphetamines which is another very deadly drug of choice. The Olympics didn’t really start banning steroids until 1975. By the 19th Century professionalized sports will change and so will everything else.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Profile
In an interview with ESPN's Peter Gammons, Rodriguez confirmed the essence of Saturday's Sports Illustrated report (Interview)Rodriguez, 33, apologized multiple times and took responsibility for his actions, showing no frustration over the fact the results from baseball's 2003 "survey" testing had been leaked. Those results, which came as baseball sought to gauge the need for a more stringent testing program which it ultimately instituted in 2004 were intended to remain anonymous and confidential. ) This is important because it tells that he really was sorry for what the fans had to find out behind scenes but there is nothing he can do to take it back now. So what he has to do is live with the shame. In 2004 there were more were about of the drug but could be explained on TV.
(2pt interview)"However, Rodriguez was ambiguous when answering questions about where and how he had procured the substances or even what those substances were. According to the Sports Illustrated report, he tested positive for testosterone and primobolan.There's many things that you can take that are banned substances. I mean, there are things that have been removed from GNC today that would trigger a positive test.") This shows that he knew what he was taking but really didn’t know why. Its important because now people know what he illegal drug he was taking and their are some question he didn’t know his self which made it look bad on his part as a role model and favorite player.('Where did you get it?' We're in the era of Balco.)
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Credible Vs Non-Credible Sources
1My first Credible Sources is kidshealth: These usually end in .edu which means it is a university. ".gov" which means it is a government organization can also be acceptable. ".org" websites are non- profits and can sometimes be acceptable.
2 few, if any ads on the page.
3 A description and heading that indicates the website is focused on your topic area.
4Authors who are clearly named and who have credentials or experience in the topic they are writing about.
5 Information that is clearly footnoted or explained where the author received their information
1My Second Credible Sources is U.S. Drug enforcement administration: These usually end in .edu which means it is a university. ".gov" which means it is a government organization can also be acceptable. ".org" websites are non- profits and can sometimes be acceptable.
2few, if any ads on the page.
3 A description and heading that indicates the website is focused on your topic area.
4Authors who are clearly named and who have credentials or experience in the topic they are writing about.
5 Information that is clearly footnoted or explained where the author received their information
1My First Non-Credible sources are Wikipedia: ".com" web domain- meaning that anyone could have purchased it.
2more than four ads on a page
3A description that tells you the website is not focused on your topic area
4No clear author and can be edited by anyone. Author who is not credentialed or experienced in the topic they are writing about
5The sources of information are not footnoted or explained.
1My Second Non-Credible Sources is Office of National Drug Control Policy:com" web domain- meaning that anyone could have purchased it.
2more than four ads on a page.
3A description that tells you the website is not focused on your topic area.
4No clear author and can be edited by anyone. Author who is not credentialed or experienced in the topic they are writing about.
5The sources of information are not footnoted or explained.